In addition to national policies, what other factors affect the annual processing capacity of tire pyrolysis oil refining projects?

In addition to national policies, what other factors affect the annual processing capacity of tire pyrolysis oil refining projects?

Beyond national policies, the annual processing capacity of tire pyrolysis oil refining projects is influenced by the following key factors:

I. Raw Material Supply and Security

Waste tire recycling system

The maturity and stability of the local recycling network directly determine the continuous supply of raw materials. A large recycling radius or fragmented supply channels will cap the maximum annual processing capacity.

Raw material quality and consistency

Different types of waste tires (e.g., passenger car, truck tires) have significant compositional differences. Frequent fluctuations in raw material quality require frequent process adjustments, reducing actual annual throughput.

II. Technical and Equipment Configuration

Equipment design capacity and stability

The core constraints are single-unit processing capacity, continuous operation time, and failure rate. Frequent shutdowns due to coking or malfunctions will result in actual annual throughput falling far short of the design value.

Process maturity and automation level

Highly automated production lines reduce manual intervention and improve operational efficiency. Conversely, immature processes may lead to low material conversion rates and high energy consumption, indirectly limiting annual throughput.

III. Site and Supporting Conditions

Site scale and layout

The factory area, storage tank capacity, and raw material storage space directly constrain the maximum processing scale of the project.

Energy and environmental supporting facilities

A stable supply of electricity and heat, along with complete waste gas and residue treatment systems, are prerequisites for full-load operation. Inadequate environmental supporting capacity may lead to production restrictions.

IV. Market and Economic Benefits

Product sales channels and price fluctuations

Weak market demand or falling prices for downstream products (e.g., fuel oil, carbon black) may prompt the project to reduce processing capacity voluntarily to control costs.

Investment payback period

Projects must balance processing capacity, unit costs, and profits. If the marginal benefit of scaling up is insufficient, enterprises may choose to maintain existing capacity rather than expanding blindly.

V. Local Supervision and Social Factors

Local environmental enforcement intensity

Some regions impose phased production restrictions based on air quality and total pollutant emissions, affecting annual throughput.

Acceptance by surrounding residents

Issues such as odor and noise pollution may trigger complaints or even shutdowns, indirectly limiting capacity utilization.